Picture Supply: Getty / Tasos Katopodis
Earlier this week, The New York Instances printed an extensive look at Donald Trump’s taxes over the course of twenty years, by which it was revealed that the president wrote off $70K value of non-public hairstyling companies throughout his time on The Apprentice as a “enterprise expense.”
This quantity, after all, was a blip within the bigger pool of appreciable tax write-offs (together with the $95,464 put towards Ivanka Trump’s hair and make-up artist), however the wider blasé response on the subject does underscore the sexist double customary of acceptable magnificence spending — to not point out expectations — positioned on high-profile feminine public figures in comparison with their male counterparts. It highlights the unfair and disproportionate opinion and intense bodily scrutiny that ladies in politics face versus males, all the best way as much as the POTUS himself.
For a greater understanding of this blatant inequality, have a look at the backlash Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez confronted after getting her hair reduce and coloured forward of her birthday final October. Whereas she paid for the remedy herself, when a conservative information outlet reported her bill was “nearly $300,” critics flooded Twitter with feedback like, “She might have gone to Supercuts,” and, “Observe what u preach!” Are you able to think about the uproar, then, if she had been to jot down it off on her taxes, calling it an “bizarre and vital” expense to keep away from paying the IRS?
Ocasio-Cortez addressed the hypocrisy in a single illuminating tweet, by which she requested: “The place’s the criticism of their idol spending $70k on hairstyling?”
Final yr Republicans blasted a firehose of hatred + vitriol my manner as a result of I handled myself to a $250 reduce & lowlights on my birthday.
The place’s the criticism of their idol spending $70k on hairstyling?
Oh, it’s nowhere as a result of they’re spineless, misogynistic hypocrites? Bought it. https://t.co/xCQGwW7EK5
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 28, 2020
For girls in politics, the double customary on maintaining appearances is alive and nicely — and is, to be clear, nothing new. For many years, Hillary Clinton has been requested about her hair and make-up as an alternative of her insurance policies. She, too, has been chastised by members of the Republican social gathering for spending her personal cash on a haircut. Even former First Woman Michelle Obama has needed to rigorously calculate how she styled her hair to keep away from scrutiny given the conservative nature of politics.
In Clinton’s 2017 memoir, What Occurred, she wrote, “I am not jealous of my male colleagues typically, however I’m relating to how they will simply bathe, shave, placed on a go well with, and be able to go. The few occasions I’ve gone out in public with out make-up, it is made the information. So I sigh, and hold getting again in that chair, and dream of a future by which ladies within the public eye need not put on make-up if they do not need to, and nobody cares both manner.”
Till the world will get to a spot the place nobody cares both manner, although, it is by no means been extra vital to care. Solely when disparate attitudes on Trump’s spending on haircuts in comparison with that of any feminine politician ceases to exist — and till we, as a society, notice that the protein fibers on someone’s head don’t dictate whether or not they may also help the financial disaster, or racial injustices, or perhaps a pandemic — will it ever be “simply hair.”